Every cash game poker player strives to move up from micro-stakes to small stakes beyond. I have been playing for over 12 years and can shed some on the various stake levels as well as what it takes to beat them.
What is considered small, mid, and high stakes poker?
How often should you take a shot in poker? For me the answer is nearly every time that I sit down to play. My default stakes are 5NL and 10NL. My shot-taking stakes are 25NL and 100NL You may notice that do not mention 50NL. I tried 50NL more than a few times when 25NL shot-taking started making money. I got my brains beat in. The first thing I would say it depends a bit what stakes level you are playing. I will assume 25nl for the moment. I will also assume 14% pfr is position specific meaning villain 1 pfr utg is 14% (if V1 is 14% overall I would assume his pfr is much tighter and this would typically force me to fold since alot of the JX hands i have dominated would be gone from his range- this is why pfr.
There are actually five different stake levels in online cash game poker:
Now that you know what the stakes are, let’s discuss each level in turn and find out what it takes to move up.
The nature of each cash game stake will vary from poker room to poker room. However, in my experience, there are some fundamental commonalities of what can be expected at each level as you move up through the stakes.
Micro-stakes poker ranges from lowly $0.01/$0.02 up to $0.10/$.25. This is usually either a place for recreational players to splash around or a proving ground for ambitious players who want to move up as soon as possible.
The games are typically characterized by looseness pre-flop with lots of limping and passive post-flop play. It is not unusual for there to be multiple players still in the pot when the river is reached.
It does not take a ton of skill to win at the micro-stakes. In fact, the winners are usually just the ones who are making the least mistakes. Here are a few tips:
How much can be made at the micros is really irrelevant. You should not be looking to play at penny stakes more than just a few weeks or months while you learn the game.
Even so, there are quite a lot of players who are full-time regs at either 10NL or 25NL. Even with mass-tabling and uber rewards, it’s hard to make more than $8 an hour doing this.
My advice is that if you don’t have aspirations to be a poker “star” and are okay just making a few hundred every month playing poker, then work hard on your game and learn to beat at least 50NL.
50NL players are not that much tougher to beat than 25NL regs, so you owe it to yourself to study hard enough to at least break into the lowest level of small stakes.
Small stakes games include just two stakes, $0.25/$0.50 and $0.50/$1.00. This is where you first start seeing a large number of full-time or part-time pros eeking out a marginal living in poker. It’s not uncommon to find players who have been 50NL or 100NL players for several years.
The quality of small-stakes games can vary widely from poker site to poker site. For example, on America’s Cardroom small stakes are very difficult to beat except for even the most dedicated players. The level of play that was once only common at 200NL or 400NL is now seen on numerous tables daily on ACR.
On the other hand, softer sites like Ignition poker have soft enough small stakes games that even newer players have a chance of winning. I would say that 100NL on Ignition is comparable to 25NL on ACR. There are more rewards on the latter, which does narrow the gap a bit. Even so, it’s always much better to play the higher stake then rely on being a “
To beat small stakes, you need to have more than just a basic “tight is right” strategy. You have to also have at least a rudimentary understanding of some advanced topics that include:
Beyond these factors, you will need to be able to think on level two and have an elementary understanding of
High volume small-stakes player with a reasonably high win-rate of 4bb/100 or high can expect to make anywhere from $15 to $25 an hour. It would not be unheard of to make between $2,500 and $5,000 a month, once rewards are figured in. Even part-time winners at 50NL can expect to make around $1,000 per month.
There actually are well-documented cases of 100NL professionals making over $10,000 a month after
Mid-Stakes includes $1/$2, $2/$4, and $3/$6 blinds. Online, these are the stakes where most of the best players on the site congregate. In fact, the only time most really good player will play higher than mid-stakes, is when there is a known bad player on the table.
For laymen, it’s impossible to tell the difference when watching a small-stake or mid-stake game side-by-side. For long-time poker professionals, the difference is usually profound.
The most striking difference that you start seeing at mid-stakes lies in the more nuanced bet sizings. People are a lot more of aware of potentially getting exploited, so they try to optimize their bet size accordingly.
For example, it’s not uncommon to still see 3x raises with a steal on the button at 100NL and below. You will almost never see this from a reg at 200NL or higher. They know they can accomplish the same thing by raising to 2.5x or even a min-raise, so why waste the extra money when they fold to a 3-bet?
If you want to join the top 2% of poker players and learn to win at mid-stakes be ready to dedicate your life to poker, at least partially, for some time
In fact, it actually seems like a pointless exercise for me to give a list of tips in beating this level. This is because it’s like trying to explain the universe in one sentence and with 4 examples.
Nevertheless, here are just a few things you must master before even attempting to beat 200NL or higher (on most poker sites):
The point of this article isn’t try and give you a guidebook to winning at poker. I understand that many people reading this won’t have a clue what I am talking about. That’s okay, but you need to be aware of just how big of a chasm there is between the poker mind maturity of a winner at micro-stakes and mid-stakes. A good analogy is for an average chess player to try playing a grandmaster.
For most online poker sites, mid-stakes is where you start to see highly skilled players emerging who can make a decent living playing professionally. For example, my win-rate at 200NL was around 8bbs/100 which gave me an approximate hourly rate just under 40/hr while 4-tabling.
Save for a few wealthy “whales”, most players will never experience what it’s like to play for average pots that exceed in excess $1,000 on a regular basis. Enter the high-stakes cash game poker professional.
High stakes poker games online include $5/$10, $10/$20, $25/$50, and $50/$100. While there are quite a few regs that play these stakes, a good number of them also still play mid-stakes as well. It’s not uncommon to see a skilled reg playing 400NL, 600NL, 1000NL, and 2000NL in the same session.
Basically, what typical high stakes players do is game select heavily and work hard to ensure that they have an edge in every game they play. In fact, often the skill difference between mid-stakes and high-stakes players mainly lies in their ability to manage their bankrolls and careers a bit better.
To win long term at high stakes takes a dedication to the game and an ongoing commitment to keeping up to date with the latest strategy. Career management must be strong.
I am not going to give you a list of tips on beating high stakes. It’s actually pretty ridiculous to do so since only 1 in 100,000 players will likely even ever play a session of 1000NL or higher. Personally, I have never played a hand higher than 600NL and am not even qualified anyway.
What I will say, is that once you are beating mid-stakes you will already understand what it takes to at least some degree. Whether you decide to take a shot at high stakes will depend mostly on financial security in taking a shot.
For the few that do make it as a successful high stakes poker player, the amount of money you can win is pretty limitless. Even for part time guys that beat high stakes, 100,000 a year likely feels like the floor for them. Think about it, 100,000 is only 100 buy-ins of $5/$10.
Stakes with a buy-in of $20,000 or higher are known as the nosebleeds. One of the most popular stakes for nosebleed players is $200/$400.
Let’s get one thing out of the way. Variance is insane at these stakes. Almost no one is actually correctly bankrolled to play the nosebleeds. Conservatively, you really need at least 50 buy-ins to be a regular at any stake. Even for the “smallest” nosebleed stakes, this is $1,000,000.
If you start talking about $500/$1000 stakes, $5,000,000 feels like a small bankroll when you consider $1,000,000 swings seem to happen almost daily for these players.
The nosebleeds are an interesting phenomenon that reached their height right before the fall of Full Tilt Poker. The volume of hands played at those ridiculously high stakes has never been matched since.
The truth is, it takes a special type of person to play at this level. You have to be a billionaire, a big risk taker, or have a huge ego to even think about taking on the nosebleeds.
Even so, the level of play at the highest levels is actually probably not as good as it is at even mid-stakes. The reason is that most strong poker players will not risk their hard-earned money without having a gigantic edge in the game. That’s why you’ll often seen players enjoying a higher win-rate at 2000NL or above than they have at 1000NL.
Since very very few many people solely play the nosebleeds, it’s more of an opportunistic or ego exercise for the majority of the player pool at any given time. Therefore, it’s not even worth commenting beyond just saying that fortunes are won and lost weekly and even daily in these games
Besides, it’s really hard to be a regular in those nosebleeds and get enough volume in. Like high stakes, the nosebleeds are more about taking shots for the vast majority of the players.
Assuming that each stake is your regular game and you are not taking shots, you typically want at least 50 buy-ins at a stake. Based on that, here are the bankroll requirements of each stake:
This article has mostly been about online poker. So, let’s briefly discuss the stakes in live games. Below is a list of the live equivalents in skill level.
Here are the live equivalents to online stakes:
Keep in mind that you can only 1-table in live poker. This means everyone is presumably able to play their A Game. Also, live recreational players tend to be much worse live. This means 200NL
Now you know the differences between all of the stakes, both live and online. You also have some idea of what it takes to become a winner at every level.
If you are interested in taking a step toward building a poker game with a strong foundation, you might be interested in my full poker tutorial.
Thanks for reading!
Who are the most famous high stakes poker players? There are too many to name them all but the most famous high-stakes players of all time include Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey, Victor Blum (Isuldur1), Doyle Brunson, Johnny Chan, Phil Galfond, John Juanda, Tom Dwan (Durrr), Doug Polk, and Ben Sulsky (sauce123).
Who is the best online poker player? Based on long-term monetary results the best online player of all time is Phil Ivey. Doug Polk is well-regarded as the best current online poker player.
What are the poker buy-in levels? There are three categories of buy-in levels in poker. Anything above 150 big blinds is generally considered deep-stacked. Anything below 40 big blinds is considered short-stacked. Everything in between is known to be a mid-stack.
Poker Stats:VPIP : PFR : Std Dev : The Red Line
Standard deviation ('Std Dev' or sometimes just 'SD') is one of those terms you've bumped in to a few times, but you've never fully got to grips to with it. Or, you've heard about it, but it just sounds far too mathsy for you to understand.
So to help you out, I've decided to explain what standard deviation in poker is all about and what it means to you as a poker player. You don't need a background in statistics to enjoy the pleasures of the SD stat, I promise.
Your standard deviation stat gives you an indication of how “swingy” your game is.
Standard deviation can also give you an indication of how far you can expect to veer from your current winrate over 100 hands (hence why Std Dev stats are shown in BB/100 ['Big Bets' or 'Big Blinds' per 100 hands]).
That's simple enough, but it doesn't give us much to work with. For a better understanding of the poker std dev stat, we'll need to find out what this standard deviation stuff is all about.
Standard deviation is a measure of how spread out numbers are from the average.
To give an example, lets say you go to your local supermarket and measure the width of 5 loose oranges. The widths of these 5 loose oranges are:
Now, instead of measuring 5 loose oranges, you decide to measure another 5 oranges from a pack of “medium oranges”. The widths of the 5 oranges from the pack are:
You'll notice that the average widths of these two sets of 5 oranges are the same, despite the width of each individual orange in each set being quite different.
Now, because standard deviation is a measure of the spread of results from the average, we can say that:
The standard deviation of the loose oranges is higher than the standard deviation of the 'medium' oranges.
I could run through an equation and give you an exact number for the 'standard deviation' of each of these two sets of oranges, but I don't want to get too mathsy (and you don't necessarily need to know how to work it out). If you are interested in the equation though, check out this very straightforward article: basic standard deviation example and equation.
This standard deviation video on youtube is also very helpful.
Note: Okay, I can't leave any stone unturned. The SD of the loose oranges is 3.3, and the SD of the 'medium' oranges is 0.8. These numbers tell us the average spread.
Okay, that's enough about oranges. How does standard deviation in poker work and what does it tell you about your winrate?
Well, instead of measuring oranges, what if you split up your poker career in to 100-hand mini-sessions (or 'chunks'), and measured your winrate for each of these sessions?
From a set of results like this, you could work out your mean average winrate (this will give you the average winrate stat that you're used to seeing) and also your standard deviation. The more your winrate varies in each chunk of 100 hands you play, the bigger your standard deviation will be.
Additionally, if you plotted the frequency of the winrates (how often each winrate occurs) over each of these 100 hand chunks in a graph, it would look something like this:
This is called a “bell curve” or a “normal distribution”. There are 2 important things to note about this graph of your winrates:
This makes sense, because more often than not your winrate will remain close to your average, but there will be rare occasions where it ends up being quite far from average.
So for example, if you have an average winrate of 4BB/100, achieving a winrate of 4.5BB/100 over 10,000 hands is very likely. However, achieving a winrate of 18BB/100 over 10,000 hands is highly unlikely.
So, we know that if we plotted a graph of our individual winrates from many small 100-hand sessions it would form a bell curve, with our most frequent winrates collecting around the centre.
But what do high and low standard deviation graphs look like?
I'm hoping that you can make sense of these graphs by just looking at them. If not though:
The lower your std dev, the thinner the bell curve. The higher your std dev, the fatter it will be to account for the wide variety of winrates.
Three useful things:
Why these percentages? Because this is just how bell curves work. Here's another bell curve graph with some notes to help you understand what's going on.
For more information, here's a short wikipedia article that actually isn't overly complicated: 68-95-99.7 rule wiki.
Lets say that you're a $50NL player with a winrate of 5BB/100. You also have a std dev of 30BB/100.
Note: In this example we're using poker tracker BBs (Big Bets), which are equal to 2x the size of the big blind (i.e. 1BB at $50NL is equal to $1 instead of $0.50).
There is a 68% chance that your winrate will fall between 1 standard deviation of your current winrate.
So there is a 68% chance that you will win (or lose) between -$25 and $35 over the next 100 hands given your current winrate and standard deviation.
There is a 95% chance that your winrate will fall between 2 standard deviations of your current winrate (2 x 30BB = 60BB).
There is a 99% chance that your winrate will fall between 3 standard deviations of your current winrate (3 x 30BB = 90BB).
3SD = 5BB +/- 90BB
3SD = -85BB <=> 95BB
3SD = -$85 <=> $95
Your playing style.
If you have a LAG (loose-aggressive) playing style you will have a high standard deviation. This makes sense, as you should already know that maniacs and LAGs experience a lot of variance.
On the other hand, if you are a nit that only ever plays premium hands, your standard deviation will be low.
If you're a TAG, you'll be somewhere in the middle.
The majority of poker players' standard deviations lie between 35BB/100 and 50BB/100 (70bb/100 and 100bb/100).
If your SD is far outside of this bracket, you're probably playing too tight or too loose to achieve an optimum winrate.
It doesn't matter. Your winrate is the most important thing.
It's like traveling to the next town in a car compared to traveling to the next town on horseback. You get the same destination in the same amount of time, you just take different routes (with one being bumpier than the other).
Most people would prefer the less 'swingy' route with a low SD, but don't change your game just because you don't like the look of your SD. Unless your std dev stat is huge and you're due for a myocardial infarction, I wouldn't worry about it.
Play with this awesome poker variance simulator.
Keep your winrate the same and enter varying standard deviations and see how the affect your results over different sample sizes.
it just goes to show how you shouldn't worry (or get too cocky) about your winrate over small sample sizes. The differences in the results is surprising.
Standard deviation is a measure of how much you are likely to swing up and down during the course of small sample sizes of hands. The higher your SD is, the larger the swings you will face and the longer it will take for your results to converge to your actual win rate.
The higher your Std Dev stat is, the more (and the bigger the) swings you will experience throughout your poker career.
I'm hoping that this big article with all the graphs has helped you to understand standard deviation in poker a little better. It can be a little tricky at first (especially with some of those equations), but it's not so bad when you start to get your head around it.
Here are some more links that I found really helpful:
Go back to the interesting Texas Hold'em Articles.
Can You Afford Not To Use
Poker Tracker 4?
“I wouldn’t play another session of online poker without it”
“I play $25NL, and in under 1 week PT4 had paid for itself”
Comments